Funding PredictsFunding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge: Rules, Cost & Payout Analysis
How it scores
Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge ranks #1 of the 1 10K plans we benchmark, with a PropBench Score of 30. Its strongest part is rules, its weakest is payouts.
One try costs $105. The evaluation needs $1,200 on a $500 static drawdown (1 in 4). The funded account needs $200 on a $500 static drawdown (1 in 1.5). Together that is about 1 in 6 tries to a first payout on coin flip odds, so a first payout costs $630 on average (the typical plan of this size: $630).
A steady trader making $40 a day gets the first payout after 36 trading days and keeps $1,920 from 3 months of funded trading.
Cost$630 per first payout0
A trader with no edge reaches a profit of d before losing a static drawdown of D with chance D ÷ (D + d). A trailing floor that follows the peak gives e−d ÷ D; end of day trailing counts halfway between the two.
#1 of 1 10K plans on this part. The 0 is its percentile rank: better than 0% of the class.
Speed36 trading days0
A steady trader makes $40 every trading day (0.4% of the account) and never loses.
#1 of 1 10K plans on this part. The 0 is its percentile rank: better than 0% of the class.
Payouts$1,920 kept in 3 months0
The same steady trader trades the funded account for 63 trading days (3 months) and asks for a payout as soon as the rules allow.
The other $80 is still in the account at the end: buffers, caps and payout timing hold it back.
#1 of 1 10K plans on this part. The 0 is its percentile rank: better than 0% of the class.
Rules0 penalty points100
Each trading restriction adds penalty points from our published checklist. Fewer points rank higher.
Drawdown type and daily loss limits that end the account are priced into Cost. Payout rules are measured by Payouts and Speed. Full checklist
#1 of 1 10K plans on this part. The 100 is its percentile rank: better than 100% of the class.
StabilityNo nerfs in 12 months50
Counts the changes to rules or prices that went against traders (nerfs) at this firm in the last 12 months, from our change tracking. Fewer nerfs rank higher.
Our own tracking started October 25, 2026; earlier history comes from the Internet Archive. See every change
The 50 is its percentile rank: better than 50% of the class.
Click a part to see how it is calculated. Each part is ranked within 10K plans: 100 is best in class. The steady trader makes $40 a day (0.4% of the account). Every number here comes from the firm's published rules and can be checked with a calculator.
Rules to watch
Each rule adds penalty points. Fewer points rank higher on Rules.
- •Daily loss limit ends the account ($300)counted in Cost
- Total penalty0 pts · Rules rank 100/100
Not confirmed from a public page yet: funded profit split, funded min profit days, news trading. These values are our best reading.
Plan specifications
- Price
- $105 one time
- Activation fee
- $0
- Reset
- None
- Profit target
- $1,200
- Drawdown
- $500, static
- Daily loss limit
- $300 (ends account)
- Consistency
- None
- Minimum days
- None
- Max contracts
- Not stated
- Drawdown
- $500, static
- Daily loss limit
- $300 (ends account)
- Profit before first payout
- $150
- Winning days per payout
- 3 × $50+
- Consistency
- None
- Profit split
- 80%
- Payout cap
- $400 per request
- Max contracts
- Not stated
- News trading
- Allowed
- Overnight holding
- Allowed
- Platforms
- Own web platform (locked)
Sources: 4 public pages ▾
PropBench Score
10K plans · Higher is better
Cost to Funded
10K plans · Price plus activation fee, one try · Lower is better
Payouts Kept
10K plans · Steady trader, 3 months funded, USD · Higher is better
Compared with its class
This plan against every other plan in its class. Hover any bar for details.
Cost per Payout
10K plans · Price per try ÷ coin flip odds · Lower is better
Best value
Score against cost per payout. Plans on the dotted line aren't beaten on both by anything else.
PropBench Score vs. Cost per Payout
10K plans
Stress tests
Six situations every trader runs into, scaled to this plan's own target and drawdown.
You make 60% of the profit target in one day, then small steady days.
Passes on day 5. A big day doesn't hold you back.
Open profit runs up to 80% of your drawdown, you close almost flat, then lose 75% the next day.
The daily loss limit ends the account on the losing day.
You trade through a scheduled major news release.
News trading is allowed.
You make 4% of the target every single day. How long until money hits your bank?
Small days never count as winning days (threshold $50).
You hold a position past the session close.
Holding past the close is allowed.
You lose half your max drawdown in a single session.
Account survives the day.
Price history
The list price and the best price we have seen, including sales.
Price history
List price and the best price we saw
Recent rule changes at Funding Predicts
Every change we detect on the firm's pricing pages, rules and help center. See all
No changes recorded yet.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge.
How much does Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge cost?+
$105 one time, with no activation fee. Passing on the first try costs $105; with retries included, getting funded costs $420 on average.
What is the profit target for Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge?+
$1,200.
What is the max drawdown on Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge?+
$500, static. On the funded account it is $500, static.
Does Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge have a consistency rule?+
No.
Is there a daily loss limit on Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge?+
Yes, $300. Hitting it ends the account.
How do payouts work on Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge?+
You need $150 of profit before the first payout, with 3 winning days of $50 or more. Each payout is capped at $400.
What is the profit split?+
80% to you.
Can I trade news on Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge?+
Yes, news trading is allowed.
Can I hold positions overnight?+
Yes.
How does Funding Predicts 10K Elite Challenge rank?+
#1 of 1 10K plans on the PropBench Score (30/100). See the methodology for how the score is built.